• News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Science & Tech
  • Culture
    • Lifestyle
    • Arts & Theatre
    • Break
  • Entertainment
    • Games
    • Music
    • Screen
  • Sport
    • Basketball
    • Football
      • Sheffield United
      • Sheffield Wednesday
    • Ice Hockey
    • Rugby League
  • Printed Edition
Search
Forge Press
Home
About us
Get involved
Logo
  • News
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Science & Tech
  • Culture
    • Lifestyle
    • Arts & Theatre
    • Break
  • Entertainment
    • Games
    • Music
    • Screen
  • Sport
    • Basketball
    • Football
      • Sheffield United
      • Sheffield Wednesday
    • Ice Hockey
    • Rugby League
  • Printed Edition
More
    Facebook
    Instagram
    Linkedin
    Twitter
    Culture Arts & Theatre Opinion: A Deep Dive into Period Literature

    Opinion: A Deep Dive into Period Literature

    By
    Adelaide Mason (she/her)
    -
    26 November 2024

    What do you think of when you hear people discussing “period literature”? Probably
    Regency England and everything that goes with it: balls, high-waisted gowns,
    dashing gentlemen… Basically, it is the world of Bridgerton that comes to mind. And
    perhaps this Netflix drama is the reason why period literature is making such a
    comeback, but is there more to it than that?

    Period literature is a general term used for books that are set in the past and address universal themes. What marks them as different from historical fiction however is that historical events don’t move the plot forward because they are not dependent on the historical period they are set in. Therefore, you could move the characters into a different historical setting to their own with only minor changes needed for everything to make sense.

    On the other hand, in historical fiction the incorporated history, which must be accurate for the book to officially be part of the genre, is fundamental to the plot, the characters and their actions. What unites these two genres however is that they are both able to speak indirectly to the present day.

    A ballroom scene from the 2005 adaptation of Pride and Prejudice. Image credit: HS Insider

    Nowadays, historical fiction is a very well-established literary genre that is easy to
    find in bookshops, libraries and even classrooms. However, this was not the case at
    the turn of the twentieth century, when Henry James described the genre as “fatally
    cheap.” Nevertheless, the genre developed massively over the past hundred or so
    years and now works of historical fiction win literary awards left, right and centre. In
    fact, three of the five works of fiction nominated for the 2023 National Book Award
    come under the umbrella of historical fiction and works of historical fiction can
    constantly be found in Waterstone’s list of Bestselling Fiction Books.

    What is interesting to me however is that what I find the most appealing about
    historical fiction is lacking from period literature. I like it when historical fiction gives a voice to those excluded traditional historical accounts as I find it brings the events to life and gives me the chance to question some of what I have been told.

    On the other hand, authors of period literature maintain a larger distance
    between their plot and characters, and the historical events of the day. This often
    leaves us with a romanticised, even sanitised, view of historical periods. Taking the
    Netflix adaptation of Bridgerton as an obvious example, we are presented with a
    depiction of Regency England that accepted people of different races at all levels of
    society.

    Lady Danbury from Queen Charlotte and the Bridgerton TV series. Image credit: The Independent

    Whilst it is true that at the time there was a significant Black population in
    England occupying positions as servants and musicians as we see in the show,
    Bridgerton’s representation of race not mattering among upper-class, aristocratic
    circles is very anachronistic. Whilst this isn’t automatically a problem in itself,
    especially as Bridgerton very much presents itself as a work of fiction, it does make
    the specificity of the experience of the non-white population of Regency England
    seem irrelevant, and it creates a false image of the period as a period where race
    held little sway over social mobility.

    Perhaps, however, it is exactly this romanticisation of history that draws readers to
    period literature. It is true that historical fiction can often be quite heavy, telling stories that are filled with less-than-ideal happenings and often being so long that
    they are quite literally heavy enough to be used as doorstops! Period literature is
    therefore ideal for readers who want to escape to the past without being forced to
    accept that people faced just as many, if not more, hardships then as they do now. I
    personally don’t think that there is anything wrong with wanting to read period
    literature for this reason, because isn’t all fiction a form of escapism in one way or
    another?

    At the end of all this I am left with the feeling that whilst period literature is seeing a
    growth in its popularity in general, it will take several years before it is widely
    accepted as a literary genre that is capable of winning esteemed awards.
    Nevertheless, this shouldn’t stop anyone from enjoying the genre since its
    significance to the literary world is only going to increase if it continues to grow its
    reader base.

    Image Credit: Britannica

    Facebook
    Twitter
    WhatsApp
    Linkedin
    Email
      Adelaide Mason (she/her)
      © Newspaper WordPress Theme by TagDiv